The mass university is good for equity, but must it also be bad for learning?
The mass university is good for equity, but must it also be bad for learning? Hannah Forsyth , Australian Catholic University When universities began expanding, they became more inclusive. While this is a good thing, scholars often look at their large class sizes and lament that many of the students won’t set foot in the lecture theatres or libraries thanks to technology, and grow increasingly frustrated at the shallow assignment responses. They ask: whatever happened to learning ? Is there still a place for old-style, face-to-face education, good clear thinking and real, tangible books? Students: responsible for their own learning? Professor of philosophy David Armstrong fondly observed what he thought was the best part of learning from his academic career that spanned the 1950s to the 1990s: I like for the Faculty of Arts the idea that you sit around for a long time discussing things in coffee shops and pubs and quadrangles and anywhere else that you can get some seating and, finall...
Comments
Post a Comment